The official blog of Vincent's Casablanca HomePage and Wagner Operas. Click the links below to explore my sites.
Richard Wagner's Operas
Thursday, August 16, 2012
Bayreuth Parsifal on TV
The August 11 performance of Parsifal that I attended at the Bayreuth Festspielhaus was filmed and shown in Europe on the Arte Network. Above is a picture of an interview during one of the intervals. Can't wait to get my hands on a recording of it. I am sure that this production will eventually find its way to DVD and Blu-Ray. Bayreuth's current production of Lohengrin by director Hans Neuenfels has recently been issued on both formats in Europe and in America. The current Parsifal should be next on the list.
Sunday, August 12, 2012
No Man is an Island: Parsifal at Bayreuth
-->
Parsifal, a work
that in 1882 Richard Wagner labeled
a “Stage-consecrating Festival Drama,” was never to be heard outside of the “sacred
precincts” of Bayreuth. For the
composer, the quasi-religious aspect of the work was the perfect liturgy for
his cathedral of music on the Green Hill.
More importantly, the orchestration of the work was written with the
Festspielhaus’s singular acoustics in mind.
Bayreuth was its home – a veritable Montsalvat on a hill guarding its
own Holy Grail. Wagner died the following
year, and his widow Cosima was not
able to stop the Metropolitan Opera
from staging a rogue production of it in 1903.
Eventually, the dominoes began to fall, and once the copyright expired
on the work in 1913, European theaters began staging the work as well. Parsifal now belonged to the world.
In my lifetime I have attended perhaps twelve performances
of this work. I have not counted -- all
of them have been at the Metropolitan Opera.
Over the years I heard Jon Vickers and Plácido Domingo triumph in the title role,
and I have heard James Levine and
the MET orchestra reach and maintain an outstanding level of musical maturity
with this work.
I know the piece fairly well, and I have listened to it
multiple times in recording following it with my Dover orchestra score. My mind’s ear knows what the next musical
phrase is going to be. Now I have heard
my first Parsifal at Bayreuth, and it is like listening to it for the first
time. In this epic production director Stefan Herheim dramatizes the
background story of the opera, setting it in Bayreuth itself with Wagner’s
house, Wahnfried, as the background.
Likewise, this production allows us to see not just the growth of Parsifal (Burkhard Fritz) from guileless fool to compassionate enlightened being, as the
composer intended, but we become witnesses to the story of the German nation
through the madness of World War I, the rise of the Nazi Party, the destruction
of World War II, and the reconstruction and unification of the German people.
In Act two, the magic palace of the sorcerer Klingsor (Thomas Jesatko) is transformed into a
military hospital ward filled with the walking wounded of World War I trench
warfare. Kundry (Susan MacLean) appears to Parsifal as
the personification of Marlene Dietrich, complete with tuxedo and top hat, and,
at the conclusion of the act, the one who hurls the sacred spear at Parsifal is
a “Hitlerjunge”, in full brown shirt and armband regalia, on a stage draped with numerous Nazi
flags. By the way, these flags are red, and have a black swastika inside a white circle, of course. The same symbol that Yevgeny Nikitin had tattooed on his chest and then covered up.
Act three begins in a Germany in ruins. Gurnemanz (the amazing Kwangchul Youn) is in uniform, a deserter from the
front, and Kundry as civilian casualty unable to say more than the only words
that Wagner provided for her: “service, service.” When Parsifal enters, however, his hair is
shoulder-length, and he is the very essence of a knight errand crusader complete with
helmet, shield and lance. As Kundry
washes his feet and dries them with her own hair, for a moment this production
takes on a very conservative tone. If
for a moment, the settings brings to mind the kind of staging that Wagner would
recognize for his work. Save for Gurnemanz’s
modern dress, it looks like the first production of this work that I saw at the
MET when I was a young man and knew very little about the work. Eventually
the production recuperates its post-modern feel, and it concludes with the Brotherhood
of the Grail as German politicians in the Reichstag. A giant mirror over them, that all along had
been reflecting a gigantic German eagle on the floor, eventually
turns to reflect the audience, the musicians in the sunken pit, and then turns
into a rotating globe that shines on all of us gathered at the Festspielhaus. Those of us gathered at Wagner’s theater
represent a microcosm of the world, and the universality of Richard Wagner’s
music is seen reflecting on us all.
Sad, Sad, Sad: Tannhäuser at Bayreuth
After the first act of Tannhäuser finished, I stepped outside and filmed the following video.
Be sure that that hopeful smile on my face disappeared very quickly after being subjected to the concluding acts of Sebastian Baumgarten's travesty on Richard Wagner's romantic opera The production is not a mindless romp, nor is it what many would consider a desecration of holy writ: it's just plain bad! We are in a unit set where the Venusberg and the Wartburg are one. Possibly, the one interesting aspect of the production. The realm of Venus with its caged subhumans, is right out of the film Planet of the Apes, Venus is pregnant, presumably with Tannhäuser's child, and The Wartburg is a biogas factory. When we enter the theater we see a curtainless stage where actors are already at work. The focal point of the set is a giant red tank, an "alcoholator" with the days of the week printed on it. It seems that this is the worker's manna, and by the actions of the chorus they love their manna. The workers are often seen embracing the contraption as if it's mother's milk.
Baumgarten has also added material to the performance that does not come from Wagner. It is the custom at the Festspielhaus for audiences to exit the theater during intermission and to enjoy the grounds, the restaurant, and the refreshing air of the Grünen Hügel. However, if you walk out you miss scenes that Baumgarten has added that shows the daily lives of the workers. For example, after the conclusion of Act two a group of workers build a makeshift altar where a priest conducts a new-wave mass complete with a litany that exalts the goodness of an industrial age. It is performance art as filler showing that the story goes on even after the curtain comes down, which is unnecessary.
This Brechtian approach to Wagner, with plenty of projection of German words, leaves me at a loss how it reflects back to Wagner's original story. For instance, in Act three the pilgrims do not come back from Rome, but from a deprogramming room where their minds have been altered so they can be more productive. The wonderful Festspielhaus chorus comes back singing Wagner's powerful music, but they are all cleaning each other, and everything in sight, not praising God and the Pope for having forgiven them. It is a visually interesting moment, but it puts us very far from Wagner's original intention.
At the conclusion of the opera Venus gives birth, and holds up her child as the last chords of the score intones. Mr. Baumgarten's job is to serve the composer, but it seems that for the most part he is serving himself and his misbegotten view of Wagner's work.
Be sure that that hopeful smile on my face disappeared very quickly after being subjected to the concluding acts of Sebastian Baumgarten's travesty on Richard Wagner's romantic opera The production is not a mindless romp, nor is it what many would consider a desecration of holy writ: it's just plain bad! We are in a unit set where the Venusberg and the Wartburg are one. Possibly, the one interesting aspect of the production. The realm of Venus with its caged subhumans, is right out of the film Planet of the Apes, Venus is pregnant, presumably with Tannhäuser's child, and The Wartburg is a biogas factory. When we enter the theater we see a curtainless stage where actors are already at work. The focal point of the set is a giant red tank, an "alcoholator" with the days of the week printed on it. It seems that this is the worker's manna, and by the actions of the chorus they love their manna. The workers are often seen embracing the contraption as if it's mother's milk.
Baumgarten has also added material to the performance that does not come from Wagner. It is the custom at the Festspielhaus for audiences to exit the theater during intermission and to enjoy the grounds, the restaurant, and the refreshing air of the Grünen Hügel. However, if you walk out you miss scenes that Baumgarten has added that shows the daily lives of the workers. For example, after the conclusion of Act two a group of workers build a makeshift altar where a priest conducts a new-wave mass complete with a litany that exalts the goodness of an industrial age. It is performance art as filler showing that the story goes on even after the curtain comes down, which is unnecessary.
This Brechtian approach to Wagner, with plenty of projection of German words, leaves me at a loss how it reflects back to Wagner's original story. For instance, in Act three the pilgrims do not come back from Rome, but from a deprogramming room where their minds have been altered so they can be more productive. The wonderful Festspielhaus chorus comes back singing Wagner's powerful music, but they are all cleaning each other, and everything in sight, not praising God and the Pope for having forgiven them. It is a visually interesting moment, but it puts us very far from Wagner's original intention.
At the conclusion of the opera Venus gives birth, and holds up her child as the last chords of the score intones. Mr. Baumgarten's job is to serve the composer, but it seems that for the most part he is serving himself and his misbegotten view of Wagner's work.
Thursday, August 09, 2012
Verstummte Stimmen - Silenced Voices
A memorable Lohengrin at Bayreuth
The first thing that you have to get over in order to strain
some type of enjoyment from the current production of Lohengrin at the Bayreuth
Festival is that director Hans Neuenfels
has dressed the chorus as rats. On the
surface, it is an absurd piece of regie-theatre, and those that never venture past
the surface were the first ones booing when the production team took their vows
opening night in 2010. But if we dig
deeper, by going to the source, i.e., if we study the story through Richard Wagner’s libretto we might be
able to conclude that the citizens of Brabant are trapped in a society where
they are abused by the powerful, and forced to serve. Are
they rats as denizens of the lower depths?
Rats as specimens in a laboratory?
Rats trapped in an Orwellian world?
A mixture of all three, I would say.
However, an inspired Winston
Smith moment arose early in the first act when one of the rats tried to
assassinate King Henry the Fowler after he commanded his subjects (the rats) to
rise to arms against the invading Hungarians.
The creature managed to pull a knife on the monarch, but before he could
harm the king the rat was dragged away by thought-police types into a
laboratory where surely his brain will be re-programmed to believe that two plus
two equals five. Mr. Neuenfels’s metaphors
are not stupid, just obvious most of the time.
Last night, the most beautiful singing came from Klaus Florian Vogt. His shining tenor cutting through the
orchestra fabric with the kind of sweet intonation that separates him from the
usual hefty heldentenors who usually take on Wagnerian roles.
Annette Dasch sang and acted the role of Elsa with conviction. She is able to convey a sense of
victimization through her acting and her sweet, but at times frail voice. Thomas
J. Mayer and Susan MacLean were
both very good as Telramund and Ortrud. Wilhelm Schwinghammer was a memorable King Henry, and Samuel
Youn once again proved that he might just be the busiest singer
in Bayreuth these days. After he has
taken the role of the Holländer this year his baritone continues to be a
focused, beautiful shining instrument.
The most impressive part of the evening was the Bayreuth
chorus. Time and time again this
ensemble, led by Eberhard Friedrich
proves that choral singing can achieve astonishing heights. Last night he took a vow with his group. It was well deserved. The same can rightly be said of conductor Andris Nelsons, who lead an impressive
reading of the score.
There were multiple curtain calls at the end, and when Mr.
Vogt appeared that ignited the house into my first Bayreuth standing
ovation. When the audience at the Green
Hill likes a performance it is as if an explosion occurs. It was very exciting to be there and
experience this.
Wednesday, August 08, 2012
My first opera at Bayreuth: Tristan und Isolde
The Festspielhaus
does a good job of welcoming newcomers.
At least that’s how I felt yesterday after stepping inside the
auditorium for the first time in my life.
I slipped in to my seat rather comfortably, I must say. For years I had heard that comfort was not
something that Richard Wagner’s
theater was known for. Save for the
wooden back (no wonder people bring cushions for lumbar support) it’s not a bad
way to listen to a Wagnerian act.
I can’t describe properly, at least not yet, what it was
like to step inside a place that you always wanted to go to all your life. Aside from a great feeling of accomplishment,
there is also the believability factor that stayed with me throughout the
evening. At times I had to forget the
opera, look around, and say to myself: “Oh, my God, I’m at the
Festspielhaus! I’m actually here! I made it!”
After an eight-year wait for tickets the sense of finally having arrived
is very big. And my first taste of the
place was with Wagner’s mature work Tristan
und Isolde.
For those in 1865 who were musically trained, the harmonic
landscape of Tristan und Isolde must have been mystifying and exhilarating. They were listening to Wagner hijacking
Romantic music into an undiscovered musical territory that Western composers had
not explored. Its daring new musical
language quickly influenced many, and it is safe to say that no work written after
“Tristan” has failed to be influenced by this astonishing work. For the ordinary listener, in the mid
nineteenth century, however, this opera must have been musically incomprehensible
and truly disorienting. Even now, for
modern un-initiated audiences, Tristan und Isolde can sound challenging, and
its musical landscape obtuse and murky. To
fully understand the work one has to analyze its musical language.
It all happens within the first ten seconds of the
opera. The “Tristan Chord,” a diminished
chord that fails to resolve the previous notes, and instead leads us to another
unresolved harmony, serves as the perfect metaphor for the forbidden sexual longing
between the two lovers. It also arguably
serves as the starting point in the history of music for the disintegration of
tonality. Wagner dares to carry this
experiment for hours, right to the end of the work. Resolution is only allowed to occur minutes
before its conclusion. The tonal landscape
resolves itself with the death of the lovers, and on top of that it is not an
easy resolution. Wagner resolves his
music in a way that opens the door to another harmonic development. To us, the “Tristan Chord” no longer sounds
puzzling. Our modern ears are accustomed
to this kind of unresolved dissonances. We’ve
heard it in contemporary classical music, jazz, and punk rock. However, for mid nineteenth century audiences
it was the unheard of music of the future.
Wieland Wagner, the
composer’s grandson and director of the Bayreuth
Festival from 1951 to 1967 described the work as “the acknowledged summit
and supreme crisis of Romantic music, and at the same time the gateway to the
atonality of our century.”
Christoph Marthaler’s
current production is odd. Set in either a has-been ocean liner or a run-down hotel in
a totalitarian state (I can’t decide which), it focuses on rings of light in the
sky and walls.
The characters are always looking up at the ceiling, or touching the
walls, where oftentimes one finds a switch that turns those lights on and
off. It is a rather odd way to interpret
Wagner’s libretto where the lovers constantly sing about wanting to be alone with one
another in the darkness of night.
This cast has been singing this production, more or less,
since its premiere. Tenor Robert Dean Smith has sung every
performance of this work. Last night, he
sounded a bit weak, and many times covered up by the amazing playing of the
orchestra under the capable hands of Peter Schneider. Iréne Theorin is one of the great Isoldes of our time. Her singing was forceful, able to ride the orchestra, and even overpower it at times. Likewise, Kwangchul Youn was a sonorous, dark King Mark. Unfortunately, during the last part of his
Act II monologue an old lady in the audience fainted, and this brought the kind
of disturbance that takes your mind totally away from the stage.
There was some ugly sounding singing from Jukka Rasilainen as Kurwenal, and a
beautiful interpretation of Brangäne by South African singer Michelle Breedt.
All in all, the truth of the matter is that I will never
forget this “Tristan” because it was my first time in Bayreuth. Perhaps, in future visits to the Festspielhaus during this trip I will be able to distance myself
from the place and concentrate on the performance. As a first timer, I think it's going to be
hard.
Monday, August 06, 2012
Bayreuth: The Margravial Opera House
The Margravial Opera
House (Markgräfliches OperHaus) is one of the last surviving European
theatres dating back to the mid 1700s.
In the words of Stephen Fry
in his documentary Wagner & Me
it is a “Rococo extravaganza” the likes of which is hard to find anywhere else
in Europe. The ornamentation is truly
breathtaking, beyond gaudy in its plethora of decoration. It transports you back to a time when this
late Baroque style was the supreme example of an age. On my first day in Bayreuth I saw the exterior of the theater where I took this picture with my iPhone. Tomorrow I hope to visit and see the marvelous interior, this time armed with my Nikon D90.
The theatre was already one hundred years old by the time
the young Richard Wagner conducted
here. For him this place represented
what he hated most about theatre going in his day. From among its statues of angels and crystal
chandeliers, royalty and the very rich came to this jewel box to see and be
seen. The lights would remain lit during
a performance, and audiences typically arrived late, talked during the show, and
usually left early. It was a place to
admire social superiors in their gilded boxes and scoff at social
inferiors. Meanwhile, the performance would
dribble on in the background, no more important than “musak” in a modern elevator.
Thanks to Wagner’s experiences in this theatre and in others
like it, he began to formulate particular ideas about what makes a theatre
piece, and how audiences should behave during one. For starters, Wagner was the first to conduct
turning away from the audience, a concept that reached its zenith in the hidden
orchestra pit at the Festspielhaus,
where neither the orchestra nor the conductor is seen at all. It was also Wagner’s idea to turn off the
lights in the theatre so that the audience could concentrate on the action on
stage, and not on the social interactions in the boxes out in the audience.
These were radical concepts from one of the most radical
minds of the nineteenth century.
Interesting that many of these ideas simmered in the mind of the young
Wagner while conducting in one of the most beautifully ornate, but conservative
minded theatres in the world.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)